|
|
|||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
A National Ad Report Cardby Ted FournierHow committed is your paper to getting its fair share of the $58 billion national-advertising market? Are you aware that national advertisers actually want to increase their newspaper buying due to our market reach and targeting capabilities, but are holding back because of our inability to send in quality tearsheets on a timely basis? An annual report card issued by the Newspaper National Network, with technical support from NAAs Quality Reproduction Task Force, aims to solve the tearsheet problem. It identifies 12 exemplary papersbut also gives mixed grades to the industry as a whole. NNN used registration, color-matching and mechanical-defect criteria to grade 2,500 national-ad tearsheets in 1999. Only nine percent earned As. Some 37 percent earned Bs, indicating minor problems with one of the three ranking criteria, such as registration being off by a dot. A whopping 52 percent were given Cs for ads considered marginal in all criteria or even a borderline failure in one area. Some 2 percent earned Fs, meaning reproduction was unacceptable. More troubling, the percentage of tearsheets earning Cs rose from 40 percent in 1998 to 52 percent last year, while the number of Bs fell from 46 percent to 37 percent. And many of the tearsheets NNN graded were second tries after initial submissions were rejected. But speaking with staffers at the 12 newspapers earning the highest grades (see table) revealed some common approaches. First and foremost, each is firmly committed to national advertising. The top-ranked papers stated that they constantly refine work flows for all printing. While most also flag critical national ads, all agreed that without intensive communication and control procedures in place, they would never achieve consistent quality. All also apply tight controls to tearsheet procedures. Most involve key production staffers in pulling "good copy" tearsheets and demanding accountability. Respondents said their quality issues involve people more often than technology. Accordingly, training remains criticalparticularly cross-training, providing an understanding of each departments capabilities and responsibilities. Communicating with advertisers also works wonders, the top-ranked papers said. Many national advertisers do not run gray barsbut if asked, they often will add one. Some papers literally go the extra mile by visiting a local store to purchase advertised items in an effort to match colors more effectively.
Also repeatedly mentioned was the need to constantly educate "upstream" through advertising departments and agencies to minimize unrealistic specifications and expectations. For example, agencies must be reminded to adjust their default settings to newsprint when running the same ad on coated stock. Finally, respondents suggested demanding that agencies differentiate among the major newspaper-printing processes, as well as 65, 85 and 100 line-per-inch screens. The first step, however, is to become more aware of the revenue available from national advertising and to prioritize it in day-to-day production. Fournier is a member of NAAs Quality Reproduction Task Force. E-mail, tfour@prodigy.net; phone, (888) 222-4888; fax, (508) 675-8869. |
|||||||||||||